This is the text of an e-mail I have sent to the Inquiry today:
"I never was a Jehovah's Witness, but for various reasons have researched
them for several years. I am a retired senior police officer with
experience of dealing with child and sexual abuse.
I have
followed the progress of the UK Charity Commission investigation and the
appeals by WTBTS with interest, as I'm sure you have.
I also
followed the proceedings of the Australian Royal Commission, and I'm
sure that you are aware of these and the findings so far. What I think
is relevant to your inquiry is that all procedures and policies, down to
a micro-management level, are directed by the 'Governing Body' in world
HQ, New York. National, regional and local bodies have no discretion
whatsoever to change those policies. This was made (excruciatingly)
clear in sworn testimony before the ARC from JW personnel at all levels
from local elders, Australian country leaders, Australian national HQ
legal adviser, to a member of the world-wide 'Governing Body' based in
New York.
The fact that all procedures and policies are dictated
by the world HQ is very relevant to a UK inquiry. If you have the
testimony and findings of ARC, it will not have escaped your notice that
any suggestions/recommendations as to improvements in procedures would
have to be referred to world-wide HQ and the 'Governing Body' before
they could be agreed to. This does not bode well. JWs have a policy
which they describe as 'Theocratic Warfare' - well documented in their
own publications. In essence, this says that they can, and should, not
tell the truth to those who they perceive as being in opposition to
them. This policy was clearly being used in some sworn evidence given
before the ARC.
Regards"